Rashomon...

You just need to watch Rashomon to understand why Akira Kurosawa is considered one of the finest directors in world cinema. For most of the viewers, it is an unsolved crime told in an interesting yet different fashion, and he/she can try to arrange the puzzles to form a solution. For movie freaks, it is much more than that; in addition to being a fine work of art, it conveys beautifully a simple message through a complex movie.

One can easily gather from the movie, that the main idea conveyed was that there is no absolute truth. We see 4 different people narrating a story, in completely different ways. While each of them tells their version of the story, the idea expressed is simply how much one’s perspective can distort reality. Or in the deeper sense, that there is no absolute reality. Reality is relative. We could relate it to the story of the blind men and an elephant, where 6 different blind men touch different parts of an elephant and each of them assume, interpret and argue that elephant looks like the part they touched.

Now, probably to what was mainly conveyed through the movie - the rationale behind the different stories. None of them were lying to protect themselves, as one can notice from the bandit’s and the lady’s story, they say they might have killed the samurai. Obviously, protection from law is not what mattered. In the bandit’s story, he glorified himself; he portrayed himself as a brave and a great warrior, who easily lures the lady. In the lady’s story, she portrayed herself as a helpless victim, trying to stand in dignity. In the samurai’s version, he was portrayed as being noble, brave, and the best thing he could do was committing suicide. In the woodcutter’s version, he is portraying each of the 3 characters equally culpable, which makes his act of stealing the dagger a trivial one. Even though, we tend to go with the woodcutter’s story because he is a neutral person, we cannot believe his as well, as he was the only person who admitted that he was lying (earlier).

In each of the version, we see that the person is glorifying themselves. It is not protection from law that mattered, but protecting one’s own ego. In every one’s story, we see the story-teller polishing his character so as to suit his ego. It portrays the insecurity in humans, the fact that no humans can survive without lying to themselves and creating a make-belief world where they seem to be a better person than they actually are. A simple message that no human is completely honest with himself!

All said, probably, the movie also conveys the message that no man is truly evil. One of the important character in the movie, the priest, keeps on saying about his faith in mankind, and in the climax, we see that it is restored. Probably, a subtle message that being a liar or a thief is not the lone way to judge one's character is also included.

Other than the message conveyed in the movie, the way in which the movie unfolds, the way the characters are molded, the way the 3 characters differ in the different versions, the acting, the sensuality of the woman, all plays a great role in shaping the movie into a masterpiece. For instance, the initial scene in which the woodcutter walks through the forest till he finds the dead body is breathtaking. We walk with him, and when he stands still seeing the body, we also freeze. Even such a trivial scene, shot with amazing beauty and intelligence, is what makes Kurosawa one among the best!

Usually, when a movie ends without a climax, or when no solutions are provided to the crime, I end up a bit frustrated (exception being Nolan’s inception). Have to admit though, this one left me fascinated!

Interpreting RuN LoLa rUn..

I prefer to call a movie intelligent, if it keeps us glued till its end, as well as if it keeps us thinking after. With a running time of just over 75 minutes, Run Lola Run accomplishes exactly that! I will not go into the plot here, rather try to point out what I interpreted from the movie.

You meet people in your life, whose life you have no influence on. You rarely matter in their life, and what happens to them is not at all related to your interaction with them. This is portrayed by at least 2 characters Lola meets in the movie, the lady with the baby, and the cyclist. In each of the 3 run’s, the story of the lady (shown as snapshots), and the story of the cyclist is different, and bears no relation to her interaction with them. No matter what our interaction with the person, their life is not influenced by us!

You meet people in your life, whom you certainly have a lot of influence on. The watchman in the bank is set as a classic example. In the 1^st run, he teases Lola initially, and later on he is shown as a person with a good heart, when he says everyone has a bad day. In the 3^rd run, after Lola’s stare, he suffers a cardiac arrest, and while in the ambulance, when the doctors try to restore his heartbeat, she gets in, and she could help it make normal. Lola’s father is set as another example, as in each of the run, his interaction with her is different, and is influenced by what she does to him.

Now, to the two main themes covered, first one, the importance of chaos and random events in daily life. One such example is what happens to Meier in the 3 runs. In the 1^st run, because he turns and looks Lola, he is a bit slow, and his car is being hit by another car. In the 2^nd run, he does not look at Lola, and the other car comes and hit his car. In the 3^rd run, he sees the running person is Lola, and he asks her if anything is wrong. Because of that delay, no accident takes place at that point, however, later in the movie; there is another accident which turns out to be fatal for Meier. Another character who is shown affected by random event is the man who takes the bag from the train. In the 1^st 2 runs, he takes the bag and goes away. In the 3^rd run, he buys the cycle, but Manni meets him in his bicycle, confronts him and takes the bag back. There are many more events in the movie attributed to chaos, like Lola spotting the casino, Manni seeing the homeless man on cycle etc etc.

Now, to what I think was the main message behind the movie. The movie deals about how we can control the chaos or randomness that happens in our life. It illustrates that if we have enough motivating factors (here, it is love), we can, at least up to an extent, control what is going to happen. There are scenes in the movie where Lola asks Manni if he really loves her, and Manni asks what she will do if he is dead. They both want to be with each other, and when they realize that, they change their approaches, and decide to change what happens to them. The 3^rd run, which ends on a happy note, is after both of them are shown realizing that they love each other, and after they decide to control what happens to them.

On a lighter note, you can even think that the movie talks about relations, when Lola is ready to do anything to save her boyfriend; her parents are involved in extramarital relations. Ideally, it is a movie, left to the viewer’s interpretation like any other. Watch it and see it for yourself.